Archive for the ‘Financial Crisis’ Category

The American Recovery & Reinvestment Act… One Year Later

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

One year ago last week, the U.S. Congress passed, and President Obama signed, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). Projections continue to show that the ARRA has softened the blow of the recession. Without it, the economy would be a lot worse. Don’t take my word on it. The New York Times printed analysis by three macroeconomic forecasting firms. But wait, there’s more. We’re now a year out from the stimulus bill. The data reveal that things are, in reality, getting better. Again, the New York Times published data showing that, immediately following passage, the economy began to turn around. The decreases in both GDP and employment stopped increasing.

The ARRA has had significant, positive effects on the economy. Without it, the job losses would likely be continuing to increases and GDP would still be falling.

With positive results like these – and more to come, because there are more stimulus funds yet to be spent – surely the bill must have passed through Congress with towering majorities.

Wrong. Dead Wrong. It passed the House with ZERO Republican votes. It passed the Senate with Three Republican votes- one of which is now a Democrat.

Despite the fact that House Republicans unanimously declined to help America out of the recession, there’s no shortage of House Republicans trying to take credit for its successes. Among them: Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA), Joe Wilson (R-SC), Adam Putnam (R-FL), Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), Geoff Davis (R-KY), Mike Castle (R-DE), Phil Gingrey (R-GA), Judy Biggert (R-IL), Chris Lee (R-NY), Patrick Tiberi (R-OH), Bill Shuster (R-PA), Mary Bono Mack (R-CA), Dave Reichart (R-WA), Sue Myrick (R-NC), and Jean Schmidt (R-OH). For a complete inventory of their hypocrisy, see here.

Republicans are comfortable fighting tooth and nail against legislation to help put America back on track and taking the credit for the benefits that they had no hand in securing. And they continue to rail against the Recovery Act.

Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) had this to say: “The Recovery Act has already worked to save or create as many as 2.4 million jobs, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.  In one year, the Recovery Act has provided $120 billion in tax cuts for 95% of working families as well as businesses across the country; loaned nearly $20 billion to small businesses to expand and create jobs; funded more than 12,500 transportation projects nationwide; kept teachers, police officers, and firefighters on the job; and accomplished much more….”

With results like these, and more to come in the coming months, I hope to see more of these signs across the country:

Mike Schillawski ‘10 is the President of the Cornell Democrats.

Update: A video produced by Organizing For America has been making its rounds on the Internet, laying out the impact the Recovery Act had.

Get Wall Street While It’s Down – The Need for Tough Regulation

Monday, September 21st, 2009

With the collapse of Lehman Brothers, which precipitated the global financial crisis, now a year in the past, it is important not to forget the lessons that the country was forced to learn. As top Wall Street firms are returning to business as usual, doling out lavish bonuses shortly after receiving life support from the tax payers, it is vital for the President and Congress to push harder for regulatory reform. Even as the stock market recovers, it is important to bear in mind that, as the New York Times puts it, the US government is “the nation’s biggest lender, insurer, automaker, and guarantor against risk for investors large and small.” Nine out of ten mortgages are government financed, the government owns 80% of insurance giant AIG, and government spending has reached 26% of GDP.

This unprecedented government intervention into the economy was of course fully necessary and justified. The bold action that was taken undoubtedly prevented the financial crisis from causing a second Great Depression. Still, Americans have a right to be angry that their tax dollars are benefiting Wall Street firms that do not seem to have changed their practices. The crisis proved that the financial sector, like a rebellious child, is unable to regulate and restrain its behavior even when it is in its own best interest.

It’s time to get Wall Street while it’s still down. The financial sector, armed with unimaginable amounts of money and influence, has traditionally been untouchable when it comes to any regulation that might slightly decrease short-term profits. Finance money has even found its way into the pockets of many Democrats. It was under the Clinton administration (though with a Republican Congress) that the Glass Steagall Act, New Deal legislation which prevented commercial banks from gambling with depositors’ money, was essentially repealed and legislation was passed that exempt derivatives and other complex financial instruments from regulation.

Even as the worst of the financial crisis was unfolding, financial firms including Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, and Credit Suisse, got together to form a lobbying group called the CDS Dealers Consortium. This lobbying group already scored a victory when the Helping Families Save Their Homes Act was passed without a provision to allow families facing foreclosure to have their mortgages renegotiated in bankruptcy courts. Though President Obama supported this measure, he sat on the sidelines, not wanting to pick a fight with the finance industry.

If Democrats don’t take on Wall Street now, while the industry is still reeling and Americans are still furious, they will not likely get another chance. Obama’s proposed Consumer Financial Protection Agency, which would ensure that ordinary consumers are not taken advantage of by financial firms, is already running into opposition by Blue Dog Democrats in the House who claim it would be too onerous for banks. Currently, consumer protection is provided for by an inefficient, ad-hoc, patchwork of regulators. Creating a single agency to ensure that ordinary people understand what they’re buying is crucial; many purchasers of subprime mortgages were unaware that they could qualify for ordinary prime mortgages. Banks are in no position to complain about onerous regulation and the President needs to stand firm on this issue.

When it comes to regulating derivatives – the complex financial instruments that helped bring down the financial system – the administration’s plan unfortunately has too many loopholes. Though some derivatives would be regulated and traded on public exchanges to provide for transparency, many “customized” derivatives would still be unregulated. As Senator Harkin (D-IA) eloquently put it “you’d get a loophole big enough to drive a truck through.”

For the good of the American people and even the financial industry itself, it is time for Democrats to take off the kid gloves. For once, someone needs to pick a fight with the bankers.

Dan Smith is the Vice President of the Cornell Democrats